A Fuel-Efficient Vehicle - Can It Be Actually So Difficult To Build? Ver. 76.56

By Camren Conroy

Around one third of new car purchasers in America considered fuel economy an important factor.. Way back in 1992 already General Motors built a vehicle that got 100 miles to the gallon - and all these years later one of people's major concerns on top of global warming and pollution is dependence on foreign oil. The GM TPC became a car that was able to get 75 miles per gallon, weighed about 1000 pounds, and looked like the Geo Metro. However, as a way to meet American safety regulations, the 3-cylinder vehicle required reinforcement weighing 200 pounds, which resulted in further development being discarded.

This was in no way the only protype developed by GM which ended up on the scrapheap. Some of these were the 1982 GM Lean Machine which performed 80 miles per gallon, and the GM Ultralite which made 100 mpg. When Honda in 1992 reached 50 mpg with the Civic VX, GM was promoting cars that got 20 mpg, while in the background they had vehicles capable of 100 mpg. In the event that cars that were able to do 100 miles per gallon had already been developed way back then, why is it that such cars are not being sold today?

Why are traditional vehicles sold in the US, while at the same time, the same vendors are selling different vehicles far away in other countries? We have included a few basic items about Biomedical Engineering, and they are essential to consider in your research. They are by no means all there is to learn as you will easily discover. It is difficult to ascertain all the various means by which they can serve you. Do consider the time and make the attempt to discover the big picture of this. But we have saved the best for last, and you will understand what we mean once you have read through. Cars that achieve more than 70 mpg have been available in Europe and Japan for a number of years. A case in point of a vehicle never sold within the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. A vehicle known as the Jazz elsewhere in the world was introduced to the States in 2007 as the Fit. The Jazz in Japan has solutions to enhance fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the Fit doesn't even use a smaller engine as an option.

Auto manufacturers in the united states tell their public that they manufacture big autos because they, the public, love big autos. It's evident that manufacturers don't make a lot of money selling a small 2-person commuter vehicle, but they certainly do selling big SUVs. Commercials have convinced the citizens of the US that Tanks on Wheels are an absolute must to have. Fuel-saving options from the giant companies are uncommon, so it's pretty easy to deduce where their motivations lay. Rather than being associated with SUVs, GM today could have been known as a leader in fuel-economic vehicles. Americans weren't denied merely by GM, but also by all of those other manufacturers who have developed fuel-efficient cars.

American auto manufacturers have never given the US people the option to acquire a fuel-efficient car, despite the world having beem embroiled in oil wars and being severely polluted. Consider how many people who were never given the opportunity would have been thrilled to have a car that was fuel-efficient? Maybe it is time for you to get those outdated plans back out and build a vehicle that has already been built before.

About the Author:

Grab The Post URL

HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "A Fuel-Efficient Vehicle - Can It Be Actually So Difficult To Build? Ver. 76.56"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus