At least one third of new automobile customers in America regarded fuel economy an important factor.. Due to the preoccupation today with pollution, global warming and America's dependence on international sources of oil, it is actually shocking to learn that as long ago as 1992 a automobile that got 100 miles to the gallon was built by Common Motors. The GM TPC became a automobile that was able to get 75 miles per gallon, weighed about 1000 pounds, plus looked like the Geo Metro.
The vehicle had a 3-cylinder engine, however was forgotten when it required 200 pounds of reinforcement to be added to comply with America's safety laws.
It really is stunning that GM had this automobile built and abandoned, but they had other prototypes that ended the same way. A number of these had been the 1982 GM Lean Machine which made 80 miles per gallon, and also the GM Ultralite which made 100 mpg. In 1992 Honda appeared to be reaching 50 miles per gallon using the Civic VX, and in the same time General Motors had vehicles behind the scenes getting 100 MPG, while selling the public cars that were getting 20 MPG.
Because vehicles have already been designed that get 100 miles per gallon, then why are they not becoming sold towards the common public? Is it due to the fact of the price of auto insurance estimates?
One more baffling factor is that many companies, while selling fuel-eficient vehicles in foreign countries, are selling conventional gas guzzlers within the US.
For quite some time vehicles that get more than 70 miles per gallon have been purchased in Japan and Europe. For example, the Volswagen Lupo has never been distributed in north america - this is really a car that gets 78 mpg. In 2007, Honda in the united states released the FIT, elsewhere recognized as the Jazz. You can get economy-boosting options using the Jazz in Japan, like a smaller engine along with other methods to decrease consumption, but not so using the Fit within the US.
The automobile companies tell Americans that they love large vehicles, and that is what they want to make large cars. Not surprisingly they generate large money on SUVs, and virtually nothing on a little two-person commuter. Commercials have convinced the citizens of the US that Tanks on Wheels are an absolute must to have.
The fact that choices have by no means been presented shows exactly where the big businesses have their interests. In lieu of being synonymous with SUVs, GM today could have been recognized as a leader in fuel-economic vehicles.
All of the other car manufacturers did exactly the same thing by creating fuel-efficient cars, then again denied them to Americans.
All of us live in a world that has waged wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have by no means even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars.
Just how many people would have loved getting a automobile that got great gas mileage, and had been never given the choice? Perhaps the instant has come to restore creating those cars that were developed only to be abandoned all those years ago.
The vehicle had a 3-cylinder engine, however was forgotten when it required 200 pounds of reinforcement to be added to comply with America's safety laws.
It really is stunning that GM had this automobile built and abandoned, but they had other prototypes that ended the same way. A number of these had been the 1982 GM Lean Machine which made 80 miles per gallon, and also the GM Ultralite which made 100 mpg. In 1992 Honda appeared to be reaching 50 miles per gallon using the Civic VX, and in the same time General Motors had vehicles behind the scenes getting 100 MPG, while selling the public cars that were getting 20 MPG.
Because vehicles have already been designed that get 100 miles per gallon, then why are they not becoming sold towards the common public? Is it due to the fact of the price of auto insurance estimates?
One more baffling factor is that many companies, while selling fuel-eficient vehicles in foreign countries, are selling conventional gas guzzlers within the US.
For quite some time vehicles that get more than 70 miles per gallon have been purchased in Japan and Europe. For example, the Volswagen Lupo has never been distributed in north america - this is really a car that gets 78 mpg. In 2007, Honda in the united states released the FIT, elsewhere recognized as the Jazz. You can get economy-boosting options using the Jazz in Japan, like a smaller engine along with other methods to decrease consumption, but not so using the Fit within the US.
The automobile companies tell Americans that they love large vehicles, and that is what they want to make large cars. Not surprisingly they generate large money on SUVs, and virtually nothing on a little two-person commuter. Commercials have convinced the citizens of the US that Tanks on Wheels are an absolute must to have.
The fact that choices have by no means been presented shows exactly where the big businesses have their interests. In lieu of being synonymous with SUVs, GM today could have been recognized as a leader in fuel-economic vehicles.
All of the other car manufacturers did exactly the same thing by creating fuel-efficient cars, then again denied them to Americans.
All of us live in a world that has waged wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have by no means even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars.
Just how many people would have loved getting a automobile that got great gas mileage, and had been never given the choice? Perhaps the instant has come to restore creating those cars that were developed only to be abandoned all those years ago.
About the Author:
Constructing a gasoline efficient auto is problematic due to the fact of the fees involved. Even though ones own auto protection estimates may perhaps be less expensive, the cost of the automobile is a considerable downside.